• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Sun, 12.05.24

Search results


June 2014
Nadav Michaan MD, Yaron Gil MD, Sagi Amzalag MD, Ido Laskov MD, Joseph Lessing MD and Ariel Many MD

Background: A growing number of Eritrean and Sudanese refugees seek medical assistance in the labor and delivery ward of our facility. Providing treatment to this unique population is challenging since communication is limited and pregnancy follow-up is usually absent.

Objectives: To compare the perinatal outcome of refugees and Israeli parturients.

Methods: The medical and financial records of all refugees delivered between May 2010 and April 2011 were reviewed. Perinatal outcome was compared to that of native Israeli controls.

Results: During this period 254 refugees were delivered (2.3% of deliveries). Refugees were significantly younger and leaner. They had significantly more premature deliveries under 37 weeks (23 vs. 10, P = 0.029) and under 34 weeks gestation (9 vs. 2, P = 0.036) with more admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (15 vs. 5, P = 0.038). Overall cesarean section rate was similar but refugees required significantly more urgent surgeries (97% vs. 53%, P = 0.0001). Refugees had significantly more cases of meconium and episiotomies but fewer cases of epidural analgesia. There were 2 intrauterine fetal deaths among refugees, compared to 13 of 11,239 deliveries during this time period (P = 0.036), as well as 7 pregnancy terminations following sexual assault during their escape. Sixty-eight percent of refugees had medical fees outstanding with a total debt of 2,656,000 shekels (US$ 767,250).

Conclusions: The phenomenon of African refugees giving birth in our center is of unprecedented magnitude and bears significant medical and ethical implications. Refugees proved susceptible to adverse perinatal outcomes compared to their Israeli counterparts. Setting a pregnancy follow-up plan could, in the long run, prevent adverse outcomes and reduce costs involved in treating this population.

May 2005
S. Maslovitz, M.J. Kupferminc, J.B. Lessing and A. Many
 Background: Foreign workers in Israel are not covered by the comprehensive medical insurance that all Israelis receive. They have national insurance and injury-related coverage, which does not include routine pregnancy follow-up

Objectives: To compare perinatal outcome between partially insured non-resident migrants in Israel and comprehensively insured Israeli women.

Methods: Parameters of perinatal outcome were compared between 16,012 Israeli and 721 foreign women living in Israel. Outcome measures included birth weight, distribution of gestational age at delivery, neonatal complications, cesarean section, neonatal intensive care unit admission, intrauterine fetal death rates, and duration of post-partum hospitalization.

Results: Deliveries prior to 28 weeks gestation occurred more frequently among non-residents (1.3% vs. 0.6%, P < 0.001). Gestational diabetes and preeclamptic toxemia were significantly more prevalent among non-residents (3.2% vs. 1.9%, P < 0.05 and 4.9% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.05, respectively). The cesarean rates were 18% and 35% for residents and non-residents, respectively (P < 0.001), and the post-cesarean recovery period was longer among non-residents (4.8 vs. 3.6 days, P < 0.05). The mean birth weight was similar in the two groups (3,214 vs. 3,231 g), although macrosomia (>4,000 g) was more prevalent among non-residents, who also had higher rates of NICU[1] admission ((9.6% vs. 8%, P < 0.05) and intrauterine fetal death (6.6/1,000 vs. 3.7/1,000, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Non-resident parturients in Israel are more susceptible to an adverse perinatal outcome than their Israeli counterparts. We suggest that governmental subsidization of non-residents' health expenditures would reduce the differences in perinatal outcome between these two groups.


 





[1] NICU = neonatal intensive care unit


Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel